Funny Games Movie Analysis

The preferred reading from director Michael Haneke gives a lot of insight to why the reference felt the way they did. Hanekes think message of the film was irony. All the eclipses that ordinarily make the viewer go al-Qaida happy and contented atomic number 18 humble in my film, (Haneke). This is why the film makes audiences so uncomfortable it takes them out of their standard beliefs of what a film should have in it. Haneke blocks these rules some(prenominal) times to give the audience change magnitude scentings of anxiousness. Theres this unspoken rule that you contri thatet harm animals.What do I do? I fling off the dog first issue. The same thing with the boy. Youre non supposed to break the illusion. What do I do? I break the illusion. Its the principle of the full-page film. Its a very(prenominal) teetotal film, (Haneke) Haneke also displays the irony through the music, only when like the film is a travesty of a serious music thriller, John Zorn is a parody of classical heavy metal. The classical music is not a soundtrack in this movie. All my music is not meant as a soundtrackis part of the action, part of the story.The otherwise music, the John Zorn music, is under the titles, and its the wry colon. OK, now we go to a thriller, (Haneke) Hanekes second message is manipulation, I cute to show the audience how much they can be manipulated, (Haneke). He purposefully toys with the audience, bringing them to unfamiliar territory. First they think its all an illusion, just a film, then I do this rewinding and suddenly you go back. I look at the viewer directly, I talk to him, I shoot at him. I do this over again and again to show how much wholeness can manipulate.In view of this predominate illusion in movies, its a good idea to create a little bit of mistrust in the verite, in the truth of moving pictures. As for Peter and capital of Minnesota being joyous that interpretation was not intended. We heard it before, however Im ve ry strike actually. First of all, the actors bent gay, but that would be beside the point. I dont deal why volume think thatbecause they be handsome, or have white clothing on, I dont know, (Haneke). boilers suit Haneke wanted the audience to feel a, smacking in the face, and it definitely worked.The negotiated reading for merry Games describes the movie as, Horror that really scared, devastated, and stayed with me pine after the final scene was over, (Galina 1). I feel that this is close to what I was thinking after the film and also to many others in the class. The nonchalant nature of capital of Minnesota and Peter really sticks to you and the infamous George, wherefore are you doing this to us? Paul, Why not? is absolutely chilling. This is scary to most people because the audience is used to a killer that has a direct motive and a back story. unmatched Games leaves you with none of that and because this is very uncommon our lack of gap-fill is shocking. I cant in timately recall another movie that make me go through the same emotions as the innocent victims in the movie did, to feel the same helplessness, hopelessness, despair, humiliation, and horror, (Galina 1). All of these emotions build up to a realization that the good guys wint win. Most of the time movies retaliate villainy and let the good hold up but when this doesnt happen audiences are shocked because our gap-fill between good and abuse comforted us that there was a chance for the good.After the awareness that evil has won a sense of They are among us, they are nice and polite, well read, shy and ironic, they have the names from the new Testament, Paul and Peter, they talk with the soft refined voices but they are monsters nevertheless who have no regard for a human life-time and who want to play their sadistic grotesque games to the extreme, sets in (Galina 1). This reception of the movie Funny Games is what I feel most viewers felt.